Read more here.
In United States v. Pool, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals wrote of familial DNA searches:
“This seems somewhat analogous to a witness looking at a photograph of one person and stating that the perpetrator has a similar appearance which leads the police to show the witness photos of similar looking individuals, one of whom the witness identifies as the perpetrator. It is questionable whether the person whose photograph helped focus the inquiry, or whose familial comparison helped focus the inquiry, has suffered any invasion of his or her constitutional right to privacy.”[1]
No comments:
Post a Comment